Comparison review: Comparing lightweight hiking boots perfect for day trips and fast packing

When choosing the best mountaineering boots, the most important thing is to make sure your shoes fit your foot shape. This is a golden rule that remains unchanging even after a long history of mountain climbing, but in recent years, when genres have become more diverse and subdivided, it is a problem that it is not easy enough to reach the perfect pair of shoes. The current situation is that you have to go around the shops and try on multiple pairs each time, making choosing shoes more complicated and cumbersome.

The situation is the same for hiking shoes, which is one of the lightest among mountaineering boots. These hiking boots are similar to everyday sneakers in appearance and comfort, and are perfect for beginners, from day trips on relatively mild terrain to staying in a light-wearing hut. These hiking boots are becoming increasingly available due to the evolution of technology and the popularity of easy hiking.

This time, we've been comparing these hiking shoes from various perspectives over the course of about six months and compiling the results. We have picked out 10 recommended items from the models sold in 2016 of major brands, and compared them under the same conditions, and evaluated them from various perspectives, including comfort, slip resistance, and fatigue resistance. In my personal opinion, is there such a difference in sneakers other than the design? I was a little worried, but when I tried to compare them carefully, I found that small differences were piled up, and in the end, the results were interesting, with a clear difference being made up of the angle I was assessing.

With the above in mind, we have selected the best outdoor gearzine hiking shoes from several perspectives, so we hope this will be of some help to choose shoes, such as those who are about to start mountain climbing or hiking, those who are looking for light mountain climbing such as fast packing, and those who are looking for shoes that won't get tired of long-term travel.

In general, the term hiking shoes is more popular, but although there are various theories about the correct terminology, for example, according to REI, an American outdoor gear specialty store, "shoes" now refer to low-cut models , so we would like to unify models that are mid-cut and above that will be discussed first to be called "hiking boots."

table of contents

• About the items we compared and tested this time
• Test results and spec comparison table
• Summary of evaluation results - Recommended hiking boots by type -
• Detailed reviews of each item (page 2)

About the hiking boots compared this time

When it comes to mountaineering boots, trekking boots (climbing boots) are expensive, sturdy, and weigh almost 500g to 1kg per shoe. However, if you walk in light clothing even on short courses that allow you to go on a day trip from urban areas, even if you are walking in a long course, it can often be a bit exaggerated and more tiring. For this reason, these days, it is easy to walk on mountain trails, and we also recommend hiking shoes that are light and comfortable, especially hiking boots that cover the ankles. summarized the benefits and recommended models here, " 10 pairs of lightweight hiking shoes you'll want to wear to the fullest ," but first we'll look at the criteria for selecting recommended candidates when actually comparing them.

• Lightweight type weighs less than 500g per foot
• Mid-cut model that protects your ankles and is highly waterproof
• Basically, models that specialize in hiking and approach shoes are excluded.
• Available in Japan, up to one pair of each manufacturer

Hiking boots are basically "door to peak" and are worn all the way from around town, so to be honest, design is especially important. For this reason, I have no choice but to have personal preferences when picking up, but I still had a lot of trouble narrowing down the search. The trouble is that even for similar purposes, this model is just over 500g. Realistically, a weight difference of about 100g is almost unlikely to have a major impact on the evaluation, but this time I've been ignoring it so I've ignored it. For this reason, there were still many shoes that would be good even if they were out of the selection, but despite the backlash, we have settled down to the 10 items this time.

Test environment

The test period for the hiking boots is approximately six months from May to early October 2016. The test is only done by the author. All items are purchased by themselves. It was used in the suburbs of Tokyo and in mountains in Okuchichibu and Joshinetsu (around 1,000 to 2,000m).

To test, we first try out the day trip course, which involves walking (or trail running) with about 7kg of luggage on our back. In addition, we randomly wear separate boots on both sides and the left and right, and compare them under the same conditions by walking on the same course (but we do not compare all combinations of 10 types). As a guideline, it is calculated that you walk normally on a day trip (including walking around town) and 20km in comparison to the left and right sides, and that you walk for a total of at least 40km with each shoe.

Furthermore, all 10 pairs are compared and tested in the same location in specific terrain conditions such as wet monoliths. Models that seem particularly good at running are also worn on trails and roads. Other detailed test conditions are supplemented in a detailed review of each item.

Five indicators are set for the evaluation items based on the following assumptions. Note that the evaluation values ​​for the test results are merely relative indicators within the test, based on the judgment of the evaluator who conducted the test and do not have any objectivity.

• Comfort is necessary for comfortable walking, such as comfort and breathability.
• "Grip" is used to land without slipping even on harsh terrain, and to convey the strength of your feet to the ground without letting it escape.
• "Support = stability" to prevent shaking when landing or kicking
• "Weight" is essential for light foot movement and fatigue reduction
• "Protection" protects your feet from friction, tearing, and other external pressure

Test results and spec comparison table

Summary of evaluation results - Recommended hiking boots by type -

1st overall: Tough terrain and speed hiking are all-around

THE NORTH FACE Ultra Fastpack II Mid GORE-TEX

The top overall ranking is TNF's lightweight mid-cut boots for fast packing, which evolved into the second generation in the 2016 season. Their high level of perfection, which combines not only lightness, but also a sense of security as a mountain climbing boot, is a major reason for their high praise. This previous work was personally shocking because it was light at 400g. When you try again with this renewed model of this season by comparing it with other models, you will realize that lightness is now only part of the appeal of these shoes in this evolved model.

Although it doesn't feel soft to the touch, the exquisite thickness and strong upper, which are neither too soft nor too hard, does not feel cramped at all, and the sense of unity with the shoes remains incredible, continuing from the previous model. Although the ankles, which are higher than others, feel like they restrict movement, they provide high protection around the ankle and stability when landing.

And what stands out more this time was the high grip power over a variety of terrain. the compression molded cradle guide technology and the Vibram MEGA GRIP outsole introduced this time showed outstanding stability, with dry terrain being the most resistant to slipping in wet rocks and wet forests with mud and moss wet, and was smooth to kick off. The grip of the Vibram MEGA GRIP outsole, which I have seen in other models in particular, . Of course, it is naturally inferior to authentic climbing boots compared to purely pure climbing shoes, but I am amazed at how advances in technology can accommodate such a wide range of terrain with its lightness.

There are quite a few models who aim to go exactly the same line between running shoes and mountaineering boots, but despite their slightly more serious trekking shoes, the balance of running shoes is the best out of the 10 pairs. Of course, it is assumed that the foot shape is correct, but the Ultra Fastpack II Mid is an extremely easy-to-use pair that can be used in all-round styles regardless of the situation.

No.1 in cost performance

Montrail SIERRAVADA MID OUTDRY

The Sierra Bada was excited by the amazing comfort I felt the moment I tried it on , actually made it as easy to use as expected. Strictly speaking, the Montbell Lapland Boots are cheaper in terms of price, but this one is probably the one that can be used for a variety of activities, including trail running, and it has achieved the No. 1 value for money as the most "value" model.

In terms of weight, it is actually the heaviest of the comparisons this time. Despite this, the great thing about these shoes is that they do not notice any difference in weight when you walk. The supple fabric used for the upper, shoelaces with excellent hold, FluidFoam midsole and a unique rubber outsole that creates comfort, and the numerous mechanisms overlap, making it a perfect match for hiking (or trail running) in this comparison.

On the other hand, we need to look a little out of weak protection that is almost like running shoes, and lack of grip on technical terrain such as wet rocks. For this reason, it cannot be said that you can go to any mountain, but if you are using it as shoes that allow you to easily run along the trails on calm terrain, this is a pair of shoes that I highly recommend as your first pair.

Fast packing boots No.1

adidas TERREX FAST R MID Gore-Tex

Everyone is surprised when you hear about Adidas' mountaineering boots, but it is a global outdoor brand with a long history and a large selection of models that are also highly excellent in the fields of trail running and fast packing. This time, the TERREX FAST R MID Gore-Tex also clearly demonstrated its abilities.

The lightness of the 400g range, the continental rubber , and the high ankle mobility allow for quick and reliable walking. Furthermore, the heel surrounded by hard plastic and formotion technology It meets the functions required for fast packing, which moves quickly under heavy loads, more accurately than any other model.

It is true that THE NORTH FACE Ultra Fastpack II Mid GORE-TEX is also a model suitable for fast packing, but if you are more concerned about speed, this is the one that we recommend. Although it is slightly inferior in grip on troublesome terrain such as wet rocks and mud, this one is the best in terms of comfortable cushioning and comfort. In other words, if you want to have overall security, the North Face is the best, and if you place more importance on speed, this one is the best. In fact, this was the one I chose when I tried a round-trip day trip at Mt. Kumotori (about 30km).

In any case, the colorful appearance makes it unexpectedly well-balanced, so there is no doubt that this is a light pair of shoes that can be used all-around, without thinking about anything too difficult. Perhaps due to frequent model changes, they often sell special prices at the end of the season every year, so they are actually a good value model.

Excellent grip and protection for all terrain

mont-bell lapland boots

Montbell's lightweight mid-cut boots were extremely unique in comparison, as they featured a running shoe-like feel. It has made it possible to walk in harsh environments such as dry mountain paths, mud, sand, and wet rocks, while lightweight, making it the most stable walking possible.

The upper, reinforced with leather, has a slightly rough feel despite its lightweight. It is true that it is quite poor in terms of comfortable foot movement, such as a stiff sole, deep ankles, and poor breathability, but on the other hand, the high level of perfection as a shoe worn for mountain climbing is incredibly unobtrusive. was the high performance of the unique outsole and trail gripper In tests on wet monoliths, Vibram MEGAGRIP , allowing even beginners to safely place their feet on their feet regardless of the terrain or weather.

In this comparison, this model is ideal for casual hiking and fast packing, and the results are as follows, with a slightly more emphasis on lightness, but to be honest, if you look at it as a normal climbing boot, it is rare that a model has such a lightness (and price) and is so strong. In terms of purpose, it may not be suitable for running activities and you may have the choice to climb, but I think it is actually quite versatile in terms of a place you can go to. This is actually a surprisingly recommended pair for those who are just starting to climb mountains.

Recommended for those who want to pursue comfort in another dimension

La Sportiva SYNTHESIS GORE-TEX SURROUND

La Sportiva SYNTHESIS GORE-TEX SURROUND responded safely to these challenges, but provided an extraordinary comfort that rivals running shoes .

, GORE-TEX SURROUND a next-generation waterproof material that combines high waterproofness and highest degree of breathability, is by far the least likely to get stuffy than you would expect. It was breathable and quick-drying, just as fast as running shoes that do not require a waterproof membrane. Nanocell technology covers the entire upper with mesh-shaped resin, providing a natural fit and ultimate weight reduction without compromising strength. Furthermore, this shallowest heel makes the ankle mobility and pairs it with a soft and cushioned Vibram outsole, making it a perfect day to walk along sunny midsummer trails with these shoes.

However, for Sportiva, which manufactures many shoe products for a wide range of mountain activities, I was forced to feel a bit weak in grip on rough roads. The softness of the Vibram outsole reduces stability due to heavy loads, and combined with weak ankles and upper protection, it is not very stable. This makes it more fitting in situations that highlight the good points of this model (high-power activities such as speed hiking with light luggage and trail running in low mountains in mild seasons), but it may not be recommended to use it anywhere else.

the La Sportiva Core High GTX, a high-cut model with even greater stability, is available only in some stores in Japan

Next page: Go to detailed reviews for each item

Detailed reviews of each item

Comfort

No matter how light and non-slip shoes you may have, you won't be able to walk comfortably unless they are comfortable to wear. Needless to say, comfort is an important factor when choosing shoes no matter what type of shoes you are, but when you're talking about the comfort of your shoes when hiking on rough mountain trails for a long time, many factors actually affect this. Therefore, in this comparison, we roughly examined the comfort of hiking boots from the following three angles, and evaluated the overall comfort level.

• The fit and comfort you feel when you put your feet in and tighten the shoelaces
• Impressed on the soles of my feet when I walk, resistance from kicking off to landing
• Breathable and waterproof during activity

Before commenting, I would like to first give a basic premise: I have tried out the 10 pairs of shoes at the time of picking up, so I would like to point out that all of them are above a certain level of comfort when they are put in. the La Sportiva SYNTHESIS GORE-TEX SURROUND was the most comfortable overall .

The nanocell technology upper is one of the thinnest and supple materials in comparison. The mesh-shaped resin wraps around the entire foot and holds it, so when the shoelaces are tightened, the tension does not bias towards a part, resulting in a uniform, comfortable fit (hold). The cord lock type shoelaces are easy to tighten and loosen and extremely easy to use. The IMPACT BRAKE SYSTEM with the Vibram outsole has a slightly deeper lug and a slightly softer rubber, providing high shock absorption. Above all, the ventilating system throughout the shoe, which makes use of GORE-TEX SURROUND This feeling was not something I could experience with other models.

Another notable thing was the Salomon X ULTRA MID2 GTX which uses SENSIFIT . The hold that wraps around you from both sides of your feet makes use of the know-how of trail running shoes, and the shoes are incredible, giving you a high hold that is comparable to running shoes. The montrail SIERRAVADA MID OUTDRY which has excellent fit and cushioning the adidas TERREX FAST R MID Gore-Tex which has a comfortable hold and high ankle cushioning and mobility, are also found to be just as impressive as the above.

grip

Unlike paved flat roads, grip is the ability to walk steadily under a variety of conditions, including terrain, condition, climbing, and descent. With excellent grip, it is difficult to slip when landing, and when kicking off, you can safely and strongly convey the force you stepped on to the ground. It's simple to put it in words, but looking at the outsoles (sounds) of each model, none of them have the same shape, and none of them can have a perfect sole in any case. For this reason, each model will design the most effective materials and patterns that each model considers, while considering balance between durability and weight.

In this comparison, in addition to a general test of up and down the peak scuffs and varied courses from the lower forest area, we also conducted a test of climbing and descending wet monoliths at the same time and at the same location. Wet rock surfaces are one of the terrains I find most uncomfortable with for hiking boots with a lot of soft soles, but what was interesting was that as expected, while many models struggled with slipping down smoothly (the one with the waist in the photo below), there was a clear difference in ability, with only a few of them almost slipping and providing stable grip.

Despite the light and soft sole hiking boots, the two featured excellent grip even on slippery rocky areas: THE NORTH FACE Ultra Fastpack II Mid GORE-TEX and the VASQUE Inhaler II GTX which used Vibram MEGAGRIP . MEGAGRIP is by no means a soft material, so it is less comfortable (cushioning) than other rubber outsoles. However, while the other boots were unable to withstand the gravity of the heavy load and were sliding one after another, we firmly grabbed the wet rock surface, allowing for stable foot movements as usual. the Adidas Continental Rubber and Montbell trail gripper showed a fairly stable grip . On the other hand, except for these four legs, unfortunately, on wet rock surfaces, there was a risk that they would immediately slip away if they hadn't placed their feet carefully.

Other than these special terrain, none of the models is particularly obviously dangerous, but considering how easy it is to walk in overall road conditions such as gravel, mud, and wooden paths, it can be said that THE NORTH FACE Ultra Fastpack II Mid GORE-TEX and Montbell Lapland boots were the most capable of kicking the ground in the air.

Stability

When considering ease of walking on a variety of terrain, the stability of boots is closely related to grip. Simply put, how can your feet not shake or twist without requiring unnecessary force or load to impacts applied to the soles of your feet? Unlike running shoes that run empty-handed, this is an increasingly important element in heavy-duty activities such as mountain climbing. This time, we will mainly evaluate stability based on two aspects.

First of all, the 10 pairs we chose this time are mid-cut models that are fixed up to the nearest ankle, so the ankles are more fixed, so it can be said that they are already more stable than low-cut hiking shoes. However, the height, material, shape, and tightness of the ankle area differs greatly from model to model, so even if it is a mid-cut, the stability and security of the ankle differ greatly depending on the model. The first point in assessing stability is how effective the construction of the heel and the ankle is.

Another important factor when considering stability is stability. Common climbing shoes have a hard core material called a shank inside the shoe, and the shoes do not distort even when you place your weight on a rough, sloped ground, allowing you to place your feet on the ground stably, even if you have heavy loads. On the other hand, many hiking boots are basically intended for quick action with light clothing, so the sole (shank) is soft and easy to bend, with priority on lightness and smooth leg movement, and shoes tend to bend easily and less stable. Therefore, in this comparison, we evaluate whether stability is not sacrificed due to its lightness and leg movement, or whether the balance between the two is maintained.

the mont-bell Lapland boots were the most highly rated in terms of stability this time . The shank plate, which has deep enough, thick ankle support and moderate rigidity, was the least likely to twist out of this time, and was extremely stable. However, it is undeniable that if you step quickly and rotate your legs faster, your support will tend to get in the way. , the La Sportiva SYNTHESIS GORE-TEX SURROUND low ankles and extremely soft shanks , making it extremely comfortable to carry around with the legs, but its stability was not flattering. Outside of these extreme models, the adidas TERREX FAST R MID Gore-Tex is worth noting. It shows that it is a very balanced item with a high level of comfort and stability, with an irregular ankle (easy to move on the back and a highly supportive side) and an unexpectedly firm shank.

weight

After arranging the sizes and measuring the weight again, the lightest model was the La Sportiva SYNTHESIS GORE-TEX SURROUND . This was predicted to some extent due to its high comfort and low stability, but the THE NORTH FACE Ultra Fastpack II Mid GORE-TEX , which maintains grip and stability, does not lose its lightness at 434g. However, as long as the shoe is restricted to less than 500g per shoe, there is no doubt that all of the models this time are the lightest among mountaineering boots, so you won't be too nervous about the difference in points between this item.

protection

Here we evaluate the strength from external obstacles, such as protection of toes that are prone to painful hits and durability against friction and tear. In the first place, although it is generally a weakness for hiking boots, which are rarely expected to be used for harsh terrain such as rocky ridges or for long periods of more than a few years, there are still excellent models that are well-built.

Mont-bell Lapland boots remain lightweight, but the shoes are reinforced with suede leather, giving you a sense of sufficient protection. Other TECNICA TCROSS MID SYN GTX , adidas TERREX FAST R MID Gore-Tex , and Salewa HIKE ROLLER MID GORE-TEX are reinforced with hard material to protect the toes that are likely to be hit by accident.

summary

This comparison has made many new discoveries, such as fluffy, not easy to walk in, light and thin, and Vibram doesn't mean you're safe, and I feel like I've once again realized the depth of the mountaineering boots. Although the 10 pairs in comparison have a difference in scores, as far as I actually wear them, all of them are quite comfortable to walk in. I think this ranking may vary depending on the purpose, preferences, and leg strength of each person.

Furthermore, complaints about fit, hold and cushioning can be greatly resolved by providing your own insole (footbed) super feet are essential for the optimal suspension for me In addition to this report, we hope that you will also be able to combine these additional parts to find the perfect shoe for you. Finally, I will introduce the articles I have published so far about choosing shoes for Outdoor Gearzine, so if you're not satisfied, you should also read this.

We also recommend this article about mountain climbing shoes.

• 5 tips to choose the right trekking shoes for your feet
• How to Fit Trekking Shoes and 6 Points to Check
• 10 pairs of lightweight hiking shoes that you'll want to wear to the fullest [less than 500g per shoe]
• Comparison review: Comparing the recommended trekking shoes from mountaineering shop staff